Calorie Calculator
Maintain weight | 0 | 100% |
Mild weight loss | 0 | 90% |
0.25 kg/week | ||
Weight loss | 0 | 79% |
0.5 kg/week | ||
Extreme weight loss | 0 | 59% |
Mild weight gain | 0 | 110% |
0.25 kg/week | ||
Weight gain | 0 | 120% |
0.5 kg/week | ||
Fast weight gain | 0 | 140% |
For Men: BMR = (10 × weight in kg) + (6.25 × height in cm) - (5 × age) + 5
For Women: BMR = (10 × weight in kg) + (6.25 × height in cm) - (5 × age) - 161
TDEE = BMR × Activity Multiplier
Example:
For a 30-year-old man (180cm, 75kg) with moderate activity:
BMR = (10 × 75) + (6.25 × 180) - (5 × 30) + 5 = 1,705 kcal
TDEE = 1,705 × 1.55 = 2,643 kcal
1 Calorie (kcal) = 4.184 Kilojoules (kJ)
1 Kilojoule (kJ) = 0.239 Calories (kcal)
1 Calorie (kcal) = 1000 small calories (cal)
1 Kilojoule (kJ) = 1000 Joules (J)
Example:
500 kcal = 500 × 4.184 = 2,092 kJ
1,000 kJ = 1,000 × 0.239 = 239 kcal
Understanding Your Daily Calorie Needs
How Our Calorie Calculator Works
This Calorie Calculator provides an estimate of your daily calorie needs based on several established formulas. Keep in mind that the results are based on population averages. The Harris-Benedict Equation was one of the first methods used to estimate basal metabolic rate (BMR), which is the energy your body burns at rest each day. While it was revised in 1984 for better accuracy, it was largely replaced in 1990 by the Mifflin-St Jeor Equation. The Mifflin-St Jeor Equation also calculates BMR and has been shown to be more accurate than the updated Harris-Benedict formula. The Katch-McArdle Formula takes a slightly different approach by estimating resting daily energy expenditure (RDEE), which factors in your lean body mass – something the other two equations don’t directly address. Generally, the Mifflin-St Jeor Equation is considered the most accurate for BMR estimation, except for leaner individuals who know their body fat percentage, for whom the Katch-McArdle Formula might be more precise. You can select your preferred equation in the calculator settings.
where:
H is body height in cm
A is age
F is body fat in percentage
The initial calorie value you get from these equations represents the estimated number of calories your body needs daily to maintain its current weight if you were entirely at rest. To account for your daily activities, this BMR value is then multiplied by an activity factor (typically ranging from 1.2 to 1.95), which depends on your usual exercise levels and accounts for the times you’re not resting.
A pound of body weight (approximately 0.45 kg) is equivalent to about 3,500 calories. Therefore, a common recommendation for losing one pound per week is to reduce your estimated daily calorie intake for weight maintenance by 500 calories. For instance, if your estimated daily calorie need to maintain your current weight is 2,500 calories, consuming 2,000 calories per day for a week would theoretically lead to a deficit of 3,500 calories, resulting in a one-pound weight loss.
It’s crucial to remember that a balanced diet and regular exercise are widely recognized as the most effective and healthy ways to lose weight. Reducing your daily calorie intake by more than 1,000 calories is generally not advisable, as losing more than two pounds per week can be unhealthy and may have negative long-term effects by slowing down your metabolism. Rapid weight loss is also more likely to involve muscle loss, which in turn lowers your BMR (since more muscle burns more calories at rest). Additionally, significant weight loss can sometimes be due to dehydration, which is also unhealthy. When combining diet and exercise, maintaining a nutritious diet is essential to support your metabolic processes and allow your body to recover. Severely restricting essential nutrients through unhealthy diets can have serious negative consequences, and weight lost this way has been shown in some studies to be unsustainable, often leading to regaining the weight as fat, potentially putting you in a worse position than before. Therefore, along with monitoring your calorie intake, it’s important to ensure adequate fiber and other essential nutrients to support your body’s needs.
Using Calorie Counting for Weight Loss
At its most basic level, using calorie counting to lose weight involves a few key steps:
- Determine your BMR: Use one of the equations provided in our calculator. If you know your body fat percentage, the Katch-McArdle Formula might give a more accurate BMR estimate. Remember that these equations provide approximations, and subtracting exactly 500 calories from your BMR won’t guarantee exactly one pound of weight loss per week – it could be less or more.
- Set realistic weight loss goals: Keep in mind that one pound of fat is roughly 3,500 calories. Aiming for a daily calorie deficit of 500 calories below your estimated maintenance level theoretically leads to a one-pound weekly loss. It’s generally not recommended to aim for more than a two-pound weekly loss due to potential negative health effects. This translates to a maximum daily calorie reduction of around 1,000 calories. If you plan on losing more than two pounds per week, consulting your doctor or a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) is advisable.
- Choose a method to track your calories and progress: Numerous user-friendly smartphone applications are available for tracking calories, exercise, and progress. Many of these apps have databases with calorie information for a wide variety of foods, including brand-name products and restaurant dishes. If specific calorie information isn’t available, they can often estimate based on the individual ingredients. While accurately gauging food portions and their calorie content can be challenging initially (which is why calorie counting isn’t for everyone), meticulously tracking your typical meals can quickly improve your ability to estimate calorie content without needing to measure every time. Websites and manual methods like spreadsheets or journals are also viable tracking options.
- Monitor your progress and adjust as needed: Track your weight and other relevant measurements (like waist circumference) over time, ideally on a weekly basis rather than daily, as daily fluctuations due to water intake and time of day are common. Aim to take measurements under consistent conditions, such as first thing in the morning before eating. Remember that weight loss is just one aspect of overall health and fitness; consider factors like changes in body composition (fat vs. muscle). If you’re not seeing the progress you expect, you may need to adjust your calorie intake or activity levels.
- Stay consistent!
These steps provide a basic framework for calorie counting. It’s not an exact science and can be made as detailed as you prefer, even incorporating tracking of macronutrient proportions (fats, proteins, carbohydrates). While the ideal macronutrient balance isn’t definitively known, a balanced intake is generally recommended, and different foods have varying effects on hunger, calorie burning, and overall health. Prioritizing minimally processed plant and animal foods tends to support healthy weight loss and maintenance.
Numerous approaches to weight loss exist, and no single method works best for everyone. What works for one person might not work for another, which is why so many different diets and exercise plans exist. While individual effectiveness varies, studies suggest that some weight loss methods are healthier than others. However, counting calories remains a commonly effective strategy. In its simplest form, if you consume fewer calories than you burn, you will likely lose weight. However, this is a simplified view, and many other factors influence healthy and sustainable weight loss. For example, ongoing research explores whether the source or timing of calorie consumption significantly impacts weight loss. Studies have shown that foods requiring more chewing and are harder to digest can lead to a slightly higher calorie burn through the thermic effect of food. While this increase might be small, these types of foods (like vegetables) are generally healthier and more nutrient-dense for fewer calories compared to many processed foods.
Despite the nuances of calorie sources, the “calories in, calories out” principle for weight loss holds true. The “Twinkie diet” example, where someone lost weight by strictly counting calories while primarily eating junk food, illustrates this. However, this approach is strongly discouraged due to the potential long-term health risks associated with nutrient-poor diets. While a sustained calorie deficit or increased physical activity should lead to weight loss, focusing solely on calorie numbers without considering food quality is not a recipe for good health.
Beyond weight loss, calorie counting can also increase your awareness of nutrition. Many people underestimate their daily calorie intake. Tracking calories can highlight the calorie content of different foods and how they affect satiety. Once you understand the calorie load of seemingly small snacks and their limited impact on fullness, making healthier choices and practicing portion control often becomes easier.
Having concrete calorie goals can also be more effective than simply trying to “eat less.” Additionally, studies have shown that using smaller plates can help reduce calorie intake by influencing portion sizes. Many people have become accustomed to oversized restaurant portions and don’t realize they are overeating.
Tracking calories can also provide a quantifiable perspective on exercise, showing how much activity is needed to burn off those extra calories from snacks. This awareness can sometimes motivate healthier eating habits.
Ultimately, the best weight loss strategy is one that fits your lifestyle and that you can stick with long-term. Calorie counting is just one of many tools available.
Zigzag Calorie Cycling for Weight Loss
Zigzag calorie cycling is a dietary approach that aims to prevent your body from adapting to a consistently low calorie intake, which can sometimes lead to weight loss plateaus. Instead of eating the same number of calories every day, you alternate between higher-calorie and lower-calorie days while maintaining the same overall weekly calorie target. For example, if your weekly target is 14,000 calories, you might eat 2,300 calories three days a week and 1,775 calories the other four days, instead of consuming 2,000 calories every day. The idea is that this variation prevents your body from adjusting to a consistently lower calorie level.
This approach can also offer more flexibility in your diet, allowing you to plan for events where you might consume more calories, like social gatherings. By eating fewer calories on other days, you can enjoy these occasions or even have occasional “treat” days without feeling as guilty, as you can compensate for the extra calories later in the week.
There’s no definitive scientific guideline on the most effective way to structure your high and low calorie days. It largely depends on your personal preferences and activity levels. A common recommendation is to vary your intake by around 200-300 calories between high and low days, with the higher calorie days often being around your estimated maintenance level. For more active individuals, a larger calorie difference might be appropriate. Our calculator provides two sample zigzag diet schedules: one with two higher-calorie days and five lower-calorie days, and another with a more gradual increase and decrease in calories throughout the week. In both cases, the total weekly calorie intake remains the same.
Ultimately, the most important factor in any weight loss journey is choosing a strategy that you find sustainable and that fits into your lifestyle. Zigzag calorie cycling, like regular calorie counting, is just one of many possible approaches.
How Many Calories Do You Truly Need?
Many people aim to lose weight by reducing their daily calorie intake. However, understanding how many calories your body actually needs to stay healthy is crucial. This number varies significantly from person to person and depends on factors like your level of physical activity, age, weight, height, sex, and overall health. For instance, a physically active young man will require considerably more calories than a sedentary older woman. According to the U.S. Department of Health, adult men generally need between 2,000 and 3,000 calories per day to maintain their weight, while adult women typically need around 1,600 to 2,400 calories, although these ranges vary based on age and activity level.
While your body can survive on a relatively low number of calories, consistently consuming too few can impair its proper functioning. Your body will prioritize essential survival functions and neglect those necessary for overall health and well-being. Harvard Health Publications suggests that women should consume at least 1,200 calories and men at least 1,500 calories per day unless under medical supervision. Therefore, if you’re trying to lose weight, it’s essential to monitor your body’s calorie needs and adjust your intake accordingly to maintain adequate nutrition.
The Impact of Different Types of Calories
The main sources of calories in most diets are carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, with alcohol also contributing significantly for some. Interestingly, studies have shown that the calorie counts on nutrition labels can sometimes differ from the actual calories your body absorbs and retains, highlighting the complexity of nutrition and explaining some of the conflicting viewpoints on the “best” weight loss methods. For example, the way you chew your food can even have a small impact on calorie burning during digestion, with more chewing potentially leading to a slight increase. Chewing more also tends to promote eating less by allowing more time for satiety signals to register. However, the exact mechanisms of these effects are still being researched.
Generally, foods that require more effort to chew, such as fruits, vegetables, lean meats, and whole grains, may lead to a slightly higher calorie burn during digestion and promote longer feelings of fullness. Certain foods like coffee, tea, chili peppers, cinnamon, and ginger have also been found to potentially increase calorie burning due to their specific compounds.
The “quality” of the calories you consume is also important. Foods can be categorized as high-calorie (calorie-dense), low-calorie (fewer calories per serving), and empty calories (providing little to no nutrients). Examples of high-calorie foods include fats, oils, fried foods, and sugary items. However, being high in calories doesn’t automatically make a food unhealthy; avocados, nuts, and whole grains are calorie-dense but also nutritious in moderation. Low-calorie foods include many vegetables and some fruits. Empty calories are found in added sugars and solid fats. Studies suggest that there can be measurable differences in how your body processes and utilizes 500 calories of carrots versus 500 calories of popcorn, potentially due to differences in chewing and digestion. While the exact reasons are still being explored, it’s important to remember that while the basic “calories in, calories out” principle for weight management holds, the calorie count on a label doesn’t always perfectly reflect the calories your body retains. While there’s no universally agreed-upon ideal ratio of macronutrients, a diet rich in a variety of minimally processed foods like vegetables, fruits, and lean proteins is generally associated with better health and more sustainable weight loss. Also, remember that calories from beverages can make up a significant portion of your daily intake, often as empty calories. While sugary sodas are obvious culprits, even juices and milk contain significant amounts of sugar and should be consumed in moderation. Opting for water, unsweetened tea, and coffee is a good way to reduce liquid calories.
Finally, remember that moderation is key for all foods, even “healthy” ones. Distinctions can sometimes be misleading, as even natural foods like fruits can be high in sugar, and “health foods” like low-fat or reduced-calorie options can sometimes compensate for the removed component with unhealthy additives like added sugar. Paying attention to the overall nutritional profile of foods is crucial for making informed dietary choices.
Calories in Common Foods
Food | Serving Size | Calories | kJ |
Fruit | |||
Apple | 1 (4 oz.) | 59 | 247 |
Banana | 1 (6 oz.) | 151 | 632 |
Grapes | 1 cup | 100 | 419 |
Orange | 1 (4 oz.) | 53 | 222 |
Pear | 1 (5 oz.) | 82 | 343 |
Peach | 1 (6 oz.) | 67 | 281 |
Pineapple | 1 cup | 82 | 343 |
Strawberry | 1 cup | 53 | 222 |
Watermelon | 1 cup | 50 | 209 |
Vegetables | |||
Asparagus | 1 cup | 27 | 113 |
Broccoli | 1 cup | 45 | 188 |
Carrots | 1 cup | 50 | 209 |
Cucumber | 4 oz. | 17 | 71 |
Eggplant | 1 cup | 35 | 147 |
Lettuce | 1 cup | 5 | 21 |
Tomato | 1 cup | 22 | 92 |
Proteins | |||
Beef, regular, cooked | 2 oz. | 142 | 595 |
Chicken, cooked | 2 oz. | 136 | 569 |
Tofu | 4 oz. | 86 | 360 |
Egg | 1 large | 78 | 327 |
Fish, Catfish, cooked | 2 oz. | 136 | 569 |
Pork, cooked | 2 oz. | 137 | 574 |
Shrimp, cooked | 2 oz. | 56 | 234 |
Common Meals/Snacks | |||
Bread, white | 1 slice (1 oz.) | 75 | 314 |
Butter | 1 tablespoon | 102 | 427 |
Caesar salad | 3 cups | 481 | 2014 |
Cheeseburger | 1 sandwich | 285 | 1193 |
Hamburger | 1 sandwich | 250 | 1047 |
Dark Chocolate | 1 oz. | 155 | 649 |
Corn | 1 cup | 132 | 553 |
Pizza | 1 slice (14″) | 285 | 1193 |
Potato | 6 oz. | 130 | 544 |
Rice | 1 cup cooked | 206 | 862 |
Sandwich | 1 (6″ Subway Turkey Sandwich) | 200 | 837 |
Beverages/Dairy | |||
Beer | 1 can | 154 | 645 |
Coca-Cola Classic | 1 can | 150 | 628 |
Diet Coke | 1 can | 0 | 0 |
Milk (1%) | 1 cup | 102 | 427 |
Milk (2%) | 1 cup | 122 | 511 |
Milk (Whole) | 1 cup | 146 | 611 |
Orange Juice | 1 cup | 111 | 465 |
Apple cider | 1 cup | 117 | 490 |
Yogurt (low-fat) | 1 cup | 154 | 645 |
Yogurt (non-fat) | 1 cup | 110 | 461 |
* 1 cup = ~250 milliliters, 1 table spoon = 14.2 gram
2000, 1500, and 1200 Calorie Sample Meal Plans
Meal | 1200 Cal Plan | 1500 Cal Plan | 2000 Cal Plan |
Breakfast | All-bran cereal (125) Milk (50) Banana (90) | Granola (120) Greek yogurt (120) Blueberries (40) | Buttered toast (150) Egg (80) Banana (90) Almonds (170) |
Snack | Cucumber (30) Avocado dip (50) | Orange (70) | Greek yogurt (120) Blueberries (40) |
Total | 345 Calories | 350 Calories | 650 Calories |
Lunch | Grilled cheese with tomato (300) Salad (50) | Chicken and vegetable soup (300) Bread (100) | Grilled chicken (225) Grilled vegetables (125) Pasta (185) |
Snack | Walnuts (100) | Apple (75) Peanut butter (75) | Hummus (50) Baby carrots (35) Crackers (65) |
Total | 450 Calories | 550 Calories | 685 Calories |
Dinner | Grilled Chicken (200) Brussel sprouts (100) Quinoa (105) | Steak (375) Mashed potatoes (150) Asparagus (75) | Grilled salmon (225) Brown rice (175) Green beans (100) Walnuts (165) |
Total | 405 Calories | 600 Calories | 665 Calories |
Calories Burned from Common Exercises:
Activity (1 hour) | 125 lb person | 155 lb person | 185 lb person |
Golf (using cart) | 198 | 246 | 294 |
Walking (3.5 mph) | 215 | 267 | 319 |
Kayaking | 283 | 352 | 420 |
Softball/Baseball | 289 | 359 | 428 |
Swimming (free-style, moderate) | 397 | 492 | 587 |
Tennis (general) | 397 | 492 | 587 |
Running (9 minute mile) | 624 | 773 | 923 |
Bicycling (12-14 mph, moderate) | 454 | 562 | 671 |
Football (general) | 399 | 494 | 588 |
Basketball (general) | 340 | 422 | 503 |
Soccer (general) | 397 | 492 | 587 |
Energy from Common Food Components
Food Components | kJ per gram | Calorie (kcal) per gram | kJ per ounce | Calorie (kcal) per ounce |
Fat | 37 | 8.8 | 1,049 | 249 |
Proteins | 17 | 4.1 | 482 | 116 |
Carbohydrates | 17 | 4.1 | 482 | 116 |
Fiber | 8 | 1.9 | 227 | 54 |
Ethanol (drinking alcohol) | 29 | 6.9 | 822 | 196 |
Organic acids | 13 | 3.1 | 369 | 88 |
Polyols (sugar alcohols, sweeteners) | 10 | 2.4 | 283 | 68 |